Federal website accessibility lawsuits hit 3,117 in 2025, up 27% from 2024, and website cases now make up more than a third of all ADA Title III filings (Seyfarth Shaw). bseoa checks for the structural WCAG violations plaintiffs' firms cite most often - as part of the same crawl you already run for technical SEO.
Digital accessibility lawsuits filed in the U.S. in 2025 across federal and state courts (Level Access).
Year-over-year increase in federal website accessibility filings from 2024 to 2025 (Seyfarth Shaw).
Missing or incorrect image alt text remains one of the most commonly cited barriers in demand letters and complaints (Darrow Everett).
This isn't only a big-brand problem - most defendants in these cases are small and midsize businesses, and roughly half of all federal filings target companies that have already been sued once before.
Every crawl runs a built-in accessibility pass alongside your technical SEO audit, flagging structural WCAG violations with the exact element and guideline reference.
Flags every image without an accessible text alternative - the single most common issue cited in ADA demand letters.
Catches links with no accessible text - "click here" icons, image links with no alt, empty anchors - that screen readers can't announce.
Flags interactive buttons with no accessible name, a frequent cause of "inaccessible checkout" complaints in e-commerce cases.
Finds inputs without an associated label - the difference between a form a screen reader user can fill out and one they can't.
Checks that every page declares its language correctly so assistive technology pronounces content properly.
Flags skipped or out-of-order heading levels that break the page outline screen-reader users rely on to navigate.
Every violation includes the specific element, the WCAG guideline it maps to, and where it lives in the page - the same raw detail bseoa gives you for every other technical SEO issue. No black box, no "82/100 score" with nothing actionable behind it.
This is automated structural testing for common, high-frequency WCAG violations - the kind most often cited in litigation. It is not a full WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA conformance certification, and it doesn't replace a manual accessibility review or legal advice. Automated tools generally catch a meaningful subset of real-world issues, not everything a human audit or assistive-technology testing would find (color contrast, keyboard-only navigation, and complex ARIA patterns need manual review too). Use bseoa to catch the common structural issues fast and cheaply, then bring in a specialist for anything client-facing or legally sensitive.
It's already built into bseoa - no separate tool, no extra subscription. Run your first crawl free for 14 days, no card required.